logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.29 2013고단1823
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The accused is a person engaging in driving cars in the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On October 28, 2012, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 19:40, and driven the intersection prior to the maintenance of the personal scambling in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city between the

Since the signal apparatus is installed and traffic control is performed, there was a duty of care for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence in contravention of the signal, led the victim D(the age of 29) driven by the victim D(the age of 29) who was left to the left from the direction of the home-fluor tamping point on the right side of the EM5 car driven by the Defendant, and followed the Defendant’s even door by the front door of the said cargo driven by the Defendant.

The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained the victim F (the 23 years old), who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, from the victim F (the finite, the finite, the finite, etc.) about two weeks of medical treatment, and, at the same time, did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle so that the finite amounting to KRW 2,119,633 of the repair cost is damaged and the Defendant escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of C Poter Cargo, and operated the said cargo vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time, time, and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Written estimate;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Signal lights;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes as to the crime committed under the corresponding provisions of the Act.

arrow