beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, “2016 Highest 393,” as of February 2, 201, 201 with D, 10,000 won checks (the check number F) issued in the name of the director of the branch office of the South-North of the Korean Bank, which was in the West of the House, was cut at E’s office on February 2, 201.
In this regard, all these were forged by E using a local and complex machine.
Since then, although the Defendant and D came to know that all of the check numbers were forged due to the same use of the check number in front of the above, they offered to change them to use the check fee and the purchase price for goods or to prepare cash.
1. On February 4, 201, at the HPC room located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 4, 2011, the Defendant: (a) sent 70,000 won in cash to the victim I of the said PC room employee I, who is aware of the fact, as if he was actually issued one copy of the forged PC, and then received 70,000 won in cash from the victim as if he was actually actually issued one copy of the PC; (b) then, the Defendant received 10,000 won in cash from the victim by requesting the exchange of one copy of the other forged PC in cash; and (c) D took place on the next page as if there is no anything wrong with the said check.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with D, exercised two copies of his own check, which is a forged security, and by deceiving the victim, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 30,000 of the PC usage fee from the injured party, and received a delivery of KRW 170,000 in cash.
2. On February 15, 201, around 03:58, the injured K in the Nam-guJ of Gwangju, the Defendant waiting in a passenger car near the Nam-gu, and D purchased drinking water equivalent to KRW 8,200,00 to the injured party who is unaware of the circumstances, and received KRW 91,80,000 in cash from the injured party under the pretext of the money as if the check was duly issued.
Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with D.