Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 69,871,400 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 11, 2017 to December 26, 2017; and (b) the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project approval and housing redevelopment rearrangement project in Zone B - Project operator: Defendant - Public announcement of project approval: Public announcement of project approval for the redevelopment project in Zone C announced by Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 30, 2012;
(b) Decision on expropriation made on December 23, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Metropolitan City: 7/10 shares in each of the Do large 313.1 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and all of the obstacles to the above ground buildings, etc. (hereinafter “instant obstacles”): February 10, 2017: Compensation for losses: 7/10 shares in each of the instant obstacles in the amount of KRW 7/72,90: 146,829,940 among the instant obstacles in the amount of KRW 7/10 shares in the instant land in the amount of KRW 7/10 shares in the amount of KRW 146,829,940: An appraisal corporation and a F-Compared District: both of the above two appraisal corporations are the comparative standard for the land in Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2 general use area: Road traffic: 2 general use area; 3: Road traffic: 3: 3: 40/70 square meters in the shape/g.
(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 24, 2017 – Compensation for losses: KRW 7/10 equity 969,213,570 out of the instant land: KRW 7/10 equity 156,235,060 among the obstacles in the instant case - An appraisal corporation: H. and a L.A. In the instant case, the appraisal corporation: The above two appraisal corporations shall be selected as a comparative standard site for the land in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G G- 172.9 square meters [Use: a land use: a special-purpose area: a Class-II general-use area, a Class-II general-use area: a Class-II road traffic: a Class-A general-use area, a private-use area: a private-use area: a private-use area: a private-use area; the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments in subparagraphs 1 through 4.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff sought payment of money equivalent to the difference between a reasonable compensation in accordance with the court’s appraisal result with respect to 7/10 shares out of the land of this case and the compensation amount for the said judgment.
The plaintiff applied for appraisal even with respect to 7/10 of the obstacles of this case, but the appraiser who has conducted the court's appraisal shall conduct an on-site investigation.