The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and six months) of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is in favor of the defendant who divided his mistake into several parts, and there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim E. However, each of the crimes of this case interferes with the legitimate execution of duties of the victim F, who is a police officer, and as a result, the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and was released as a flagrant offender, threatening the victims by knife, etc., which is a dangerous article, and threatened the victims with an injury, and the nature of the crime was extremely poor in light of the motive, method of the crime, etc., the defendant was punished by suspended execution due to the same kind of crime, etc., the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment as a crime prejudicial to the State's function by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority. In addition, considering the motive, circumstance, circumstance, the defendant's age, character, and environment after the crime of this case was committed, the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above defendant's allegation is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.