The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unfluent and unfair.

2. 판단 피고인이 C, D와 공모하여 저지른 도박개장 범행은 불법한 재산상 이익을 얻기 위한 목적으로 도박장소를 개설함으로써 건전한 근로관념과 사회의 미풍양속을 해하는 도박행위를 조장하는 것으로서 엄히 처벌할 필요가 있는 점, 나아가 피고인은 직접 도박에 참가하여 한 판에 300만 원 내지 1,000만 원의 판돈을 걸고 약 11시간 동안 330여회에 걸쳐 ‘도리짓고땡’ 도박을 하였는바, 도박의 수법횟수판돈의 규모에 비추어 그 죄질이 좋지 않은 점, 이 사건 범행 후 잠적하여 상당기간 도피하였던 점 등은 피고인에게 불리한 정상이다.

However, as the defendant is detained and tried at the court below, he has a deep depth of the crime of this case and reflects the fact that he has been punished for gambling for more than 10 years, and there has been no other history of punishment for the same crime before the crime of this case. D, an accomplice, was sentenced to imprisonment for one year, suspension of execution for the crime of this case (Yanju District Court Decision 2012Da163, 72 (merged), etc.). Since the degree of the defendant's participation in the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be more serious than D, the balance of punishment with D cannot be considered in determining the punishment for the defendant. Considering the circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.