beta
Text
1. On September 14, 2015, the decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff was revoked.
2...
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 1, 2006, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on June 30, 2012, when serving as a Army officer.
B. On July 2008, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having knee-free on the right side (hereinafter “the primary accident”), and as having undergone treatment on kne-free on the right side at the Gae-dong located in Daejeon on July 25, 2008, and had undergone treatment again on January 26, 2009 (hereinafter “the second accident”), at C Hospital located in the Government of Jung-gu on January 27, 2009 (hereinafter “the second accident”), and received treatment on January 29, 2009, as a result of the MRI examination at the Armed Forces Hospital of the Armed Forces on January 29, 2009, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having received from the Armed Forces Hospital of the Republic of Korea on February 1, 2009 (hereinafter “the instant difference”).
C. On July 3, 2012, the Plaintiff discharged from active service: (1) on the ground that “A person who has rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation was subject to education and training under the supervision of the commander during the military service, and was suffering from the instant wounds.” However, around January 29, 2013, the instant wounds cannot be deemed due to the reasons for the injury alleged to have never been paid by the Defendant on January 29, 2009; (2) again, on May 15, 2013, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of non-conformity with the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation; (3) on the ground that “A person who has rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation was subject to the disposition of distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that “A person suffered from the instant wounds due to the second accident,” but the Defendant cannot be deemed to have received from the Defendant on November 15, 2013.