logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.12 2016고합15
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강간)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours against the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From the birth of the victim to the date of the father of the victim C (the father of the victim 22 years of age), the defendant has resided with the victim in Ulsan-gu D 401.

1. Around 23:00 on August 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against a victim who had sexual intercourse with the victim by administering the victim to a hotel located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul with the victim; (b) holding the victim in his/her arms in his/her arms; and (c) holding the victim in his/her clothes in his/her face to the victim, and (d) forcing him/her to commit an indecent act against the victim who had sexual intercourse with the victim.

2. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape by Relatives) will be good if he or she was aware of the fact that he or she had got the victim to return to his or her baby from his or her standpoint in his or her place of residence D or 401 on November 17, 2015.

There is no sex relationship with the first experienced woman, and even if you married to the other male, they may proceed with a divorce, and even if they are married to the other male.

In doing so, it would be better to enter into a sex relationship with sheshea and to talk with shealy and shealy shealy.

“Although the victim said that he did not comply with the sex relationship with the Defendant, the victim did not commit an attempted act as if the victim would have committed an act that would inflict bodily harm on the victim and sexual intercourse after suppressing the victim’s resistance, but the victim attempted to have sexual intercourse with the Defendant, even though he did not have sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to rape the victim's kinship.

3. On December 5, 2015, the Defendant forced the victim to leave the victim’s face twice by hand on the ground that the damaged person has concealed his/her happiness from the Defendant in the above residence and her male-child movement.

arrow