The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although there is no evidence that the defendant violated the signal signal, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant of the facts charged that the defendant violated the signal signal is unlawful.

Furthermore, even if the defendant violated the signal, it is unreasonable to punish the defendant, who is the victim of the relevant accident, on the ground of the signal violation, inasmuch as the accident occurred due to the other party's mistake.

2.1) First of all, we examine whether the Defendant violated signal signals. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court reveals that at the time of the instant accident, the Defendant driven the vehicle, driving the vehicle, driving the vehicle, driving the vehicle, driving the e-section 4 at two parallels from the e-section 3 to the e-section 5-lane e-section 5, and C, driving the taxi, driving the e-mail at three parallels from the e-lane 5 to the e-section 3 lanes, driving the vehicle, driving the vehicle, driving the vehicle at three parallels, driving the vehicle at three parallels from the e-lane 5-lane e-off to the 6-lane 5-lane e-stop 5-lane e-stop 6m from the e-stop e-stop e-stop e-stop e-stop e-stop e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-stop 6m from the stop zone 5m.