1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 11, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the sale of trees (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant, with respect to about 2400 weeks with a focus on around approximately 145929m2 and about 400m2 in Sejong-si, Sejong-si, and about 357m2 prior to D, which had been planted in usual, with the following:

즉, ㉠ 계약금 및 중도금(7,000만 원)의 지급기한은 2008. 4. 30.까지, 잔금(7,400만 원)의 지급기한은 2009. 6. 30.까지로 각 정하고, ㉡ 매도인은 위 수목의 매매계약 체결과 동시에 매수인에게 이를 인도하며, ㉢ 매도인은 위 수목의 굴취 기간 내에는 매수인과의 합의가 없는 이상 위 부동산의 전부 또는 일부에 관한 반환요구를 할 수 없고, ㉣ 매수인은 위 수목을 인도받고 빠른 기일 내에 성실하게 관리판매한 후 여백의 면적에 느티나무, 주목, 이팝나무, 매실, 살구나무 등의 묘목 3,000주를 식재하여 관리하고 위 매매계약한 수목의 전량 굴취와 동시에 이를 매도인에게 무상증여하는 것이 그 주된 내용이었다.

B. On April 30, 2008, the Defendant, according to the instant sales contract, paid the Plaintiff the down payment and intermediate payment of KRW 70 million, and sought to mine attention. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff’s interest in the real estate subject to the instant sales contract (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is more than KRW 400,00, which is more than the quantity stated in the said sales contract, and obstructed the extraction of the instant real estate entrance by preventing the Plaintiff from spreading the door of the instant real estate due to the decline.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant did not mine trees planted on the instant real estate and confirmed the quantity of trees planted on the instant real estate over several occasions with an agent designated by the Plaintiff, and the remaining quantity of trees excluding the attention of significantly lowering the value of goods due to the death or destruction, etc. shall be approximately KRW 2,400 to KRW 2,50.