All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment with prison labor, three years of suspended execution, community service) against the Defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

2. The defendant and the prosecutor's assertion that the crime of this case was committed in the first instance, and the defendant recognized all the crimes of this case when the defendant was in the court, and against his mistake, and the defendant appears to have committed the destruction of evidence by putting the crime of this case in fear of organized violence as retaliation, etc. In addition, the crime of destroying evidence of this case was committed by the defendant himself by making his own statement at an investigative agency, and there are some circumstances to consider the circumstance. The defendant plans to support his family while working in the beauty room after closing the entertainment tavern of this case and going in the beauty room. The defendant plans to support his family while working in the entertainment tavern of this case, which might cause difficulty in his family's livelihood if the defendant is sentenced to punishment. The defendant committed the crime of violating the Juvenile Protection Act, even though he was under the suspension of execution due to the crime of aiding and abetting the above crime of violating the Juvenile Protection Act, and the crime of violating the Juvenile Protection Act was committed with the same kind of crime of destruction of evidence, which may seriously obstruct the defendant's own character as a woman's entertainment business establishment.