Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the business owner of the “C” located under 107 under the ground of the building B, received KRW 110,00 as the price for sexual traffic from D, a male guest who had found the above business around March 15, 2017, and had E, a sexual traffic female, receive KRW 110,00 from D as the price for sexual traffic.

On the 21st day of the same month, the Defendant continuously received KRW 110,00 from a male guest who had found the above business place on the 21st day of the same month at the price of sexual traffic, and had F, a female sexual traffic woman, do a similar sexual intercourse with a man’s sexual flag, which enables F, a man-made woman to see the trace of sexual intercourse by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to E, D, and G;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment, such as site photographs, etc. of the case), and photographs of the site;

1. Investigation report (as to the details and circumstances of on-site crackdown)

1. Reporting on detection (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic);

1. A report on internal investigation (as regards the type of business operation, etc.);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The circumstances that are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The act of arranging sexual traffic is not likely to have a significant social hazard, such as the commercialization of sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals; the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence on November 30, 2016 by drinking driving at the Suwon Friwon, who was under the suspended sentence of six months; the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was under the suspended sentence of six months; the Defendant continuously controlled his business even though he was controlled on one occasion: The Defendant recognized his mistake and against himself; the Defendant has no record of the same kind of punishment; and the Defendant’s above circumstances and the Defendant.