1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant entered into a contract on April 16, 2015, and the same DNA (hereinafter “difinite”) as the Plaintiff and DNA Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “difin”).

(B) Of the data center construction works in the presence of B, cotton equipment and ancillary works (hereinafter “instant construction”) among the data center construction works.

(2) At the time of the above deliberation, the Defendant notified that the design conditions of the sacrific device should meet the conditions above 350% of the permissible wave level, and that the sacrific device should be verified.

3) As to the instant construction works, the Defendant decided to conduct the designated minimum competitive bidding among the Plaintiffs, DNAs, and B, and on May 11, 2015, the Defendant held the site site consultation committee against the said three companies, including the Plaintiff, and issued the site site report report and the design of screen devices (construction standards, specifications, etc.).

The key contents of the site descriptions delivered by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, etc. are as follows:

1. Outline of the subcontracted construction scope - See the installation of a screening system between the second floor and the third floor above the ground, and the manufacture of a screening system for shop shop shop shop shop sh-down shop shop sh-down spESAL production, and design drawings and specifications for production of upper part PEESAL-in part of the upper part, and design drawings and specifications;

2. Period of construction on site descriptions: From May 15, 2015 to October 31, 2015, the period of construction on site descriptions: The period of construction on site areas within 40 days from May 15, 2015, and from October 31, 2015: The period of construction on site areas within 130 days from the date on which the companies designated to engage in aggregate construction work: The period of installation on site areas among aggregate construction works: Within 30 days from the date on which the installation of PETSAL is inspected.

3. On May 20, 2015, the Defendant conducted an electronic bid by means of a total bid on the instant construction project on the same basis as the Plaintiff and Dr. 1) No description of the construction site provided on the basis of the site descriptions, and on the basis of drawings, specifications, site descriptions, design standards, etc.