logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.08.13 2015가단9183
어음금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly combine the Plaintiff with KRW 250,000,000 and Defendant Daeyang Cable Co., Ltd. with respect thereto on March 2015.

Reasons

1. The Defendant Daeyang Cable Co., Ltd. issued an electronic bill indicating the claim at face value of KRW 250,00,000, issue date on October 27, 2014, and on January 27, 2015, the Seoul Geumcheon-gu Seoul District Court and the Industrial Bank of Korea at the place of payment (hereinafter “instant electronic bill”) and endorsed the other Defendants on the instant electronic bill in turn.

The plaintiff presented the electronic bill of this case lawfully at the place of payment on the payment date, but refused to pay due to the shortage of deposit. Thus, the plaintiff demanded the defendants, who are the drawer and endorser, to pay the electronic bill of this case 250,000,000 won and its delay damages. 2. grounds for recognition

A. Defendant Daeyang Cable Co., Ltd.: (a) filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures with the Seoul Central District Court 2015 Ma10033, and was decided to commence rehabilitation procedures on March 9, 2015; (b) but (c) rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures on May 11, 2015.

: Each entry of evidence and the purport of whole pleadings as set forth in subparagraphs 1 through 3

(b) Defendant two-party corporation: Judgment on deemed confession (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

(c) The average time of the defendant corporation, and Estek: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow