logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.01.15 2014고단1673
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From Jun. 20, 2014 to Oct. 30, 2014, the Defendant, while operating Pyeongtaek-si B, had six rooms in which beds, etc. are installed, employed female employees D (a disposition of suspending prosecution on Nov. 24, 2014) and had female employees attend sexual intercourse by receiving 100,000 won in cash per time from many male customers, such as E (a disposition of suspending prosecution on Nov. 24, 2014), and arranged for sexual traffic by paying to female employees the money calculated as 50,000 won per time out of the amount of sexual traffic received from customers, with the benefit of 13,300,000 won per time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Calculation of profits from the sexual traffic);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. provides that there is no room for prior action in that the crime of this case has been committed in spite of the fact that there is any past record of punishment for the crime of this case for the reason of sentencing, the punishment as ordered shall be determined based on the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances after the crime, etc., considering that the confession of the crime of this case has been divided while being led to the confession, and that there is no past record of punishment exceeding the fine twice even

arrow