A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court Ansan branch on April 20, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 20, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on August 13, 2009.

1. Intersections;

A. On September 2009, the Defendant sent D and once sexual intercourse at D’s house located in Yongsan-gu, Busan-gu, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, 335.

B. From November 2009 to December 12, 2009, the Defendant sent D and once sexual intercourse at D’s house as described in the foregoing paragraph (a).

C. On December 201, 2009, the Defendant respondedd with D and once at the Monael where it is difficult to find out the trade name in Goyang-si, Goyang-si.

On January 2010, the Defendant sent D and once sexual intercourse at D’s house described in the above paragraph (a).

Accordingly, the defendant was linked to D and each other over four times.

2. F and the Defendant had a single sexual intercourse with F at the motherel in which it is difficult to find out the trade name in the one-time Sinsan-gu, Sinyang-si, Sinyang-si, Sinyang-si.

3. Intersections.

A. On June 2010, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with G at the motherel where it is difficult to know the trade name in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yeongdeungpo-dong.

B. Around July 2010, the Defendant sent G and once sexual intercourse in the pentan-gun of Hongcheon-do, where the trade name is unknown.

In this respect, the defendant was sent to G and each other over twice.

4. H and the intersection;

A. A. Around September 2, 2010, the Defendant sent H and once sexual intercourse at the telecom with which it is difficult to find out the trade name in Goyang-si, Goyang-si.

B. From September 2010 to October 2010, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with H at the motherel where the trade name in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yeongdeungpo-dong is unknown.

In this respect, the Defendant got H and each other over two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination of suspect suspect regarding D by the prosecution;

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. A written statement of F, H and G;

1. A complaint filed and an attached marriage certificate;

1. In the case of an investigation report (including fraud against a suspect), the investigative report (in the case of accompanying the currency details), the currency details attached to the investigation report (in the case of accompanying the currency details), and the criminal facts