logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2017.06.28 2017고정25
산림자원의조성및관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who resides in Gyeong-gun, Ulsan-gun, and is a person who resides in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and is expected to suffer damage in the future due to the fact that pine trees located adjacent to the site of a house are in the course of building a new house for the purpose of residing in around April 2016, and that it is necessary to cut down trees with the permission of cutting standing trees and the consent of sanitation from the relevant government office, despite not implementing the permission of cutting down standing trees and the consent of sanitation. At the request of Defendant B, it is a person who causes damage to forests of KRW 135,190 by cutting down 3 pine trees and 12 pine trees in any mountain owned by others.

Defendant

B is a person in charge of the change of the G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G located in the Gyeongjin-gun in the Gyeongjin-gun in the Gyeongbuk-do, and when felling standing timber in the forest, it would cause damage to the forest by letting the relevant government agency cut standing timber and cut it with the consent of the relevant government agency at the request of the defendant A at around April 2016, by making the relevant person cut three parts of the trees and twelve parts of the trees from any mountain owned by others in the Gyeongjin-gun E E E located in the Gyeongjin-gun in the Gyeongbuk-gun in the Gyeongjin-gun in the

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

B’s legal statement, part of Defendant A’s legal statement (limited to Defendant A) against each of the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol against H, I, and J, and the pertinent legal provision as to the criminal facts applicable to on-site photographing statutes, and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: The Defendants: The Defendants’ custody order for provisional payment under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) for each of the Defendants: (a) of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants; (b) the investigation protocol against each of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants; and (c) the pertinent legal provision as to the criminal facts subject to on-site photographing statutes; and (d) the Defendants did not participate in the instant crime by requesting or not giving instructions to fell trees.

However, the following circumstances are acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court.

(1) Defendant.

arrow