Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2014, the Defendant, at around 13:00, damaged the property by using a white-ro presses, which had been previously owned by the victim D in Jindo-gun C, in order to make it impossible to identify the address on the road name tag installed therein, and continuously damaged the property by continuously destroying the house door by using the word “exploitation” and “proption to remove”.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Partial statements made by the police in relation to D;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report on the occurrence of losses;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 366 of the Criminal Act that selects punishment, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Non-existent part of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the fact that the defendant reflects his/her wrong and that some of the circumstances surrounding the crime exist)

1. On September 8, 2014, the Defendant intruded into a building managed by the victim D on September 8, 2014, by opening an entrance and entering the entrance, without the consent of the victim D, in the building managed by the victim D in Jindo-gun C.

2. Determination

A. According to the legitimate examination of evidence by this court, the following facts are recognized:

1) The deceased F is the father of the deceased G (the deceased F, the deceased on August 13, 1997, the deceased on August 13, 199), and the Defendant is the children of the deceased G.

2) On August 11, 1931, 1931, the deceased F purchased a building of 212 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”) with H of Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, and around 1932, 2 Dong-dong (the instant building) had not been registered on the ground, such as the instant land, and used the instant building as a residence.

3) On February 29, 2008, the Defendant registered the transfer of ownership of the former real estate, which was in force on the instant land at the time.