beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane car.
On July 8, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 16:20, and proceeded in accordance with the two-lanes between the two-lanes from the E apartment room to the control center in Gwangju Seo-gu.
The driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and left side and safely manipulate the steering and brake system to prevent accidents.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.192%, driven a breath without properly examining the breath while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.192%, was mistakenly driven by the Defendant’s vehicle front section of the Victim F (the age of 42) driving while temporarily stopping the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, due to occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as salt and tensions of the tensions in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and spawn in the open two locations, spawn, spawn salt, tensions, etc.
2. On February 1, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Gwangju District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. On August 20, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. on August 20, 2009. On January 28, 2010, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
At around 16:20 on July 8, 2020, the Defendant driven a chip car at approximately 11 km from the Iel of the G in Gwangju Mine to the front street in the same Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in a state of drunk alcohol concentration of 0.192%.
Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1.Written statements of F.I.D.