A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. On January 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around the road crosswalk in front of the “C cafeteria” in the “C cafeteria B,” the Defendant destroyed that the sum of repair costs would be KRW 1,204,773,00,000, on several occasions, at the front of the road crossing in front of the “C cafeteria”, and the victim D owned by the victim D, who was waiting for the signal, sold the front door of the signal EM7 passenger car, and damaged it.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1(a) at the victim F’s GYF rocketing car driving seat, etc., sold several times before the victim’s car driving seat, and damaged the Defendant’s total amount of KRW 779,326.

2. On January 9, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested and investigated as an offender for the same reason as the description in paragraph 1 at the I District Office located in Sinposi on 21:53 on January 9, 2018, and the Defendant was arrested and investigated as an offender for the same reason, the Defendant called this I District Court for the Security and Security Department affiliated with the I District.

This dogbbucks . . . Doing the desire to go to J, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the investigation of the tea by walking the left buckbucks one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J and F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the statutes on the photograph of the case, photograph of the closure related to the destruction of property, photograph of the closure related to the obstruction of the performance of official duties, and written estimate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although there is no record of criminal punishment in addition to fines, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant, such as moving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol while being arrested as an offender in the act of carrying out official duties after the defendant was drunk despite his/her past record of criminal punishment of a fine due to damage to property even though the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order, and walking the police after being arrested as an offender in the act of causing damage to property.