1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The defendant is engaged in the manufacture of vessel engine parts with the trade name of "B".

[See the business registration certificate submitted by the Plaintiff] On April 10, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works, such as cutting, melting, and processing, supplied by the military camp with the military camp on April 10, 2014 (hereinafter simply referred to as the “military camp”). From that time, the Defendant carried out construction works, such as steel plates, in the military camp workplace.

[B] Around December 2014, the Plaintiff requested the military camp to supply steel raw materials, such as steel plates necessary for the manufacture of vessel engine parts, transformers parts, etc., and supplied them to the military camp.

[The legal brief dated March 2, 2017] Around February 2, 2015, the Defendant issued a business registration certificate stating telephone, facsimile number, e-mail, etc. to the Plaintiff [A]; and the Plaintiff issued an electronic tax invoice to the Defendant and issued a detailed statement of transaction from February 2, 2015 to April 2015.

[A, on the other hand, the tax invoice of June 30, 2015 is about the goods that the Defendant separately ordered the Plaintiff, separate from military territory, so long as it is apparent that the Defendant fully repaid the amount of KRW 700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won is not a direct relation with the cause for the Plaintiff’s claim in the instant case. The Plaintiff asserts that (i) in the instant case, first, from February 2, 2015 to April 2015, upon receiving a request from the Defendant for the supply of goods from the Defendant and the Defendant’s total amount of KRW 15,109,60,000 ($ KRW 1,4960,000 + KRW 7,260,000 on March 3, 2015 + KRW 6,353,6360,00,000,000).

However, we cannot accept all of the plaintiff's argument.

First, between the plaintiff and the defendant.