Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, in the forest managed by the Victim FF in Sincheon-si B, C, D, and E, and in the forest owned by the victim H in G, it refers to the forest owned by I and J as the Defendant’s forest. The Defendant was willing to gather the standard by employing it as the gathering seal.

1. From December 12, 2016 to August 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the forests and fields managed by the Victim FF in Sincheon-si B, C, D, and E; and (b) in the forests and fields managed by the Victim H in G, the Defendant ordered I and J not to know the victims’ forest land; (b) collected the amount equivalent to KRW 1,400 kilograms (amount of damage 2,100,000) with the above I and J without permission of the victims; and (c) stolen the standard, which is the product of the victims’ forest.

2. On December 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim F forest owned by the victim F in Sincheon-si, Sincheon-si to take a big-level clion from the victim’s forest; (b) ordered the said I and J to take a big clion from the victim’s forest; (c) let the said I and J, who did not know the fact that the forest was the victim’s forest, collect a total amount of 30 km (amount of damage 45,000 won) without the victim’s permission; and (d) cut off the victim’s forest that is the product

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each statement of F, H, and K;

1. Investigation report (Recommendation, etc. for a return direction by seized articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to tools and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Article 73(1) of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 34(1) and 31(1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not know even though he/she is in the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and again commits each of the crimes of this case, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant.

(b).