logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.10.07 2015구단50392
치료종결 처분 및 휴업급여 처분 취소
Text

1. A disposition taken by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on September 4, 2014 to terminate treatment on October 31, 2014, and temporary layoff benefits after September 2, 2014.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 201, the Plaintiff was employed by the Home Pluco Co., Ltd., and was performing the duty of displaying and arranging goods at a large-scale Slucco store operated by the said company. On September 201, 2013, the Plaintiff was under occupational accidents, such as where a pain occurred, such as double display of heavy goods from the beginning, and the left hand hand in the face of the continued work, and a pain has occurred to the right hand in the course of continuing work (hereinafter “the instant disaster”), and around December 2, 2013, the Plaintiff received the first medical treatment approval for the first six parts of the slucule infection on both sides, and received the additional medical treatment approval for the second part of the upper part of the slucule aggregate, around April 10, 2014.

(hereinafter the above approval of the first medical care and the approval of the additional medical care for the injury and disease are the injury and disease of this case). B.

On August 28, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted a medical treatment plan containing medical opinions of the Macheon-do Hospital affiliated with the Macheon-do University that “The Plaintiff is in need of medical treatment, such as pharmacologic treatment and rehabilitation treatment, as there remain pains to the pipe that performed the sculpary reculcing treatment on April 1, 2014 and the sculpary treatment of three-made fibres complex,” but on September 4, 2014, the Defendant submitted to the Plaintiff on September 4, 2014, a medical treatment plan to the effect that “after the medical treatment is completed by October 31, 2014,” “The possibility of employment treatment after the present date,” under the result of the deliberation of the advisory society of the Defendant’s advisory society, the Plaintiff’s treatment plan for temporary layoff benefits from September 15, 2014 to October 31, 2014, and only the Plaintiff’s treatment plan for temporary layoff benefits from 2014.

In addition to the above treatment closure disposition and the site payment disposition of temporary layoff benefits, "the instant disposition" shall be referred to as "the instant disposition.

(ii) [In the absence of dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 3, 4, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion on September 2, 2014.

arrow