A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 12 years and a fine of 2 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Criminal facts

and the facts constituting the cause of the attachment order [criminal facts]

1. On June 16, 2013, the Defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was sought (hereinafter “Defendant”) were sought to murder a female on the ground that: (a) around 22:10 on June 16, 2013, the victim D (nex, 53 years of age) located in Eudio, Eudio (hereinafter “victim”) located in Eudio, Eudio, Eudio, where approximately 1 year ago, the victim was suffering from the Defendant’s living together with other female members; and (b) the victim was aware of the Defendant’s desire to take away from the Defendant’s living abroad; and (c) he was able to kill the female on the ground that the victim was able to take away from the Defendant’s living abroad; and (d) the victim was able to take her home at the above studio parking lot.

The Defendant: (a) the victim, who returned from home, parked a vehicle in the said parking lot and disembarked from the driver’s seat, prevented the victim from escaping by hand; (b) the victim’s face and body; and (c) the victim attempted to kill the female by attaching the victim’s clothes to the victim’s body, which was holding aground with a capacity of 1 liter and a bar with a capacity of 1 liter, but the victim was her attempted to kill the female by placing the victim’s clothes on the victim’s face and body. However, the victim was her attempted to take emergency measures, such as cutting down the fire by getting out from the body that the victim turns out and was treated as aground with the nearby child-care center, and she was sent back promptly and transmitted back, and attempted to take three degrees pictures from the victim’s face and 60% of the telegraph.

2. At the time and place mentioned in Paragraph 1, the Defendant was at the victim D, as seen above, having the victim d aground with gasoline up to the Gursom straw part owned by the victim, and thus, there was a risk of spreading the above vehicle to the victim’s clothes if she put a fry on the victim’s clothes.

However, the defendant neglected his duty of care to prevent the spread of the fire and caused the fire to spread to the front part of the above automobile blicks through the body of the victim, which is the wind to attach the fire to the clothes of the victim.

The Defendant is guilty as above.