logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.19 2018고정2134
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 20:50 on December 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim C (50 years of age) who was an exclusive parking zone for the back of 158 Hyundai Apartment 109, Dong-gu, Incheon Gyeyang-gu, was issued with a fine for negligence to the vehicle E in the name of the Defendant, which is the seat of the Defendant, illegally parked in the resident-only parking zone; and (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “this Chewing, peep, peep, peep, peep,” spit the victim’s face two times in order to prevent the victim from getting on board the controlling vehicle; (b) twice the victim’s side satising the victim’s legitimate parking; and (c) obstructed the victim’s legitimate parking, and at the same time interfere with the victim’s affairs, and at the same time, the victim’s 10-day left-hand body and the injury of the victim, including approximately 3 weeks 10 and 10-day left-hand gate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. C’s statement;

1. Sedic and field photographs;

1. A report on the results of X-ray reading;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation, report on internal investigation (survey on a wooden phone), investigation report (Attachment of a report on the results of the F Hospital search and X-ray reading), investigation report (Analysis of the contents of a recording file by a victim recorded on the spot), investigation report (Analysis of the contents of a recording file by a victim recorded on the spot), investigation report (Analysis of a recording file conversation between B employee and witness

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order requires the Defendant to withdraw the imposition of a fine for negligence on the alcoholic vehicle traffic control personnel who has controlled illegal vehicles parked by the offender, and thereby interferes with the duty of regulating spirits by taking a bath, assault, etc., and it is not good in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime.

arrow