1. The plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs registered their business at the North Busan District Tax Office with the following contents:

- Trade Name: D - Other than Plaintiff A - The opening date of the business: The location of July 23, 2010 - The location of that business: The location of Busan Northern-gu E-100 and 31 joint business: the Plaintiff B

B. On January 27, 2011, Plaintiff A is a “instant commercial building” at the Busan Northern-gu store (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

Only 32 rooms, including those of 36 through 39, 56 through 72, and 90 through 100, shall be referred to as referring to the rooms of 32 or less of the first floor.

The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the F (at the time, referred to as the “instant lease agreement”) on behalf of the owners of the said units, as set forth in the following subparagraphs (hereinafter referred to as the “D”), and the Plaintiffs operated the KIKO on the trade name “D” after the instant lease agreement.

- Rental deposit: 50 million won - Monthly rent: 8 million won (by value-added tax) - Lease period: From February 8, 2011 to March 30, 2013

C. The Defendant is the owner of 43 and the mother of G, the owner of 66, who is delegated with the authority, etc. concerning the management and lease of commercial buildings in 66 from the said G. D.

F Around the time before and after the conclusion of the instant lease agreement, the F obtained the consent of seven of nine members of the first floor operating committee of the instant commercial building including the Defendant in the column of consent (Evidence A No. 3).

E. The Plaintiffs used the public corridor of the first floor of the instant shopping mall in the operation of the KIKO.

F. On February 2012, the Defendant submitted to the Busan Northern District Office a petition of the content of the request for restoration of the public corridor, as it is illegal.

G. On September 2012, 2012, Plaintiff A received a corrective order from the Busan Northern District Court to restore to its original state. On May 2013, 2013, Plaintiff A issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 (Seoul District Court Decision 201Da4337) for the following criminal facts from the Busan District Court.

The defendant is a person who operates D.