logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.10.16 2019고단1098
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is an employer who runs a lodging business with 11 full-time workers in Seopopo-si B.

1. When a worker dies or retires, the employer in violation of the Labor Standards Act shall pay the wages, compensations, and all other money or valuables within fourteen days after the cause for such payment occurred;

Provided, That the date may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties in extenuating circumstances.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is working in the above workplace from June 1, 2012 to October 31, 2018.

A retired worker C's total amount of 21,654,490 won, including wage 2,707,910 won on March 2018, was not paid within 14 days from the date of retirement, which is the date of the occurrence of the cause for payment, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the date of payment.

2. An employer who violates the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act shall, in case where a worker retires, pay the retirement allowance within fourteen days after any cause for such payment occurred; and

Provided, That the date may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties in extenuating circumstances.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is working in the above workplace from June 1, 2012 to October 31, 2018.

The retirement allowance of retired workers C was not paid 18,429,385 won within 14 days from the date of retirement, which is the date of the occurrence of the cause for payment, without agreement between the parties to the extension of the payment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 109 (1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Articles 44 subparagraph 1 and 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act.

C. After the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to want the punishment of the defendant.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow