logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.06 2018고단3800
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a resident of Gyeyang-gu Incheon apartment E, 304 Dong 1003, and the victim F (25 years) has a dispute over the noise problem between ordinary stories with the children of the house owners of the same floor below the same 903 floor.

On April 30, 2018, around 23:30 on April 30, 2018, the Defendant reported that the victim, within the elevator elevator of the above apartment, arrived at the nine floor, went from the elevator, and that the victim, “I am out of the elevator, I am out of the elevator,” and “I am out of the wall.”

In other words, "the victim's inside part of the drinking house was seriously affected by the victim's injury to the victim, such as an open upper room, an abundance of the bed steel, closure, etc., which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, grounds for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment, and grounds for sentencing;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] general injury (the scope of general injury) and the aggravated area (six months to two years) (the special aggravated person] (excluding four types).

2. A dispute has occurred between the defendant's family members and the victim's family members due to noise between the decision-making floor of the sentence. However, even though there was no circumstance to urge the dispute at the time of the instant case, the defendant was injured by the defendant's decision in consideration of the victim's internal body and the victim's family members.

After the occurrence of the case, the Defendant denied the CCTV images from the police investigation to the date of confirmation, and did not make any effort to kill the victim or recover damage until he/she attends the trial date of this case.

The victim, due to the injury, such as the fladder, etc. suffered in the instant case, in a situation where continuous progress observation and treatment are required, and the degree of damage is not easy.

arrow