1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 30, 2008, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan for the first time on September 30, 2008, and visited Pakistan several times. On November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea again on November 30, 2012, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on February 6, 2013.

B. On February 27, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On March 25, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 25, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on December 16, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. From November 14, 2011, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff joined a PTPP political party and took part in political activities. On June 12, 2012, the members of the PMF-N political party assaulted the Plaintiff and friendlys on the ground that they did not participate in the PMF-N political party in the LL-N city, Korea LL-N. The Plaintiff sought the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she did not subscribe to the PML-N.

In addition, the Pakistan continues to commit terrorism, and there is a risk due to it.

Therefore, the instant disposition made on a different premise is unlawful, since the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan is likely to be harmful for the said reasons.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. In full view of the following circumstances that can be seen by adding to the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement in the evidence Nos. 3 through 8 of this judgment, all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the circumstances alleged in this court.