logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2016.12.14 2016가합5718
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as a party is a company that aims at sediment manufacture and sales business, etc., and the Defendant is a person who vicariously sells sedi, etc. manufactured by the Plaintiff from May 1, 2004 to March 31, 2007 at the department store store of AK Plaser to July 31, 201, from April 1, 2007 to July 31, 201, and from August 1, 201 to June 2012.

B. The Plaintiff and each department store operator entered into a special purchase transaction agreement with a lot shopping company, which operates a department store (hereinafter “shot shopping”), with the following terms and conditions. The Plaintiff entered into a special purchase transaction agreement with a department store and an operator of a new department store, and entered into a special purchase transaction agreement with a similar terms and conditions.

(2) The term “sale under a special contract” refers to the transaction form in which the Plaintiff purchases goods on credit from the Plaintiff and pays the Plaintiff the sales amount after deducting the sales revenue at a certain rate or a certain amount after selling the goods on credit on condition that the goods, among the goods purchased by a lot shopping, may be returned. The term “sale under a special contract” refers to the transaction form in which the Plaintiff receives money, etc. from the lot shopping in return for the goods supplied by the Plaintiff as the price for the sales of the goods sold by the lot shopping. The term “sale under a special contract” refers to the transaction form in which the Plaintiff receives money, etc. from the lot shopping in return for the sales amount.

(Article 2. - The due date for the payment of goods: Within 40 days from the due date for monthly sales (Article 7(2) - The payment made by the Plaintiff for slot shopping is equal to the amount computed by multiplying the sales of goods by 25%.

(Article 10(1). - Lot shopping is assigned to the Plaintiff’s employees or other employees who are employed by the Plaintiff to engage in their sales business, etc., or the Plaintiff is charged with the labor cost of the employees employed by lot shopping.

arrow