1. The plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive claims against the primary defendant and their conjunctive claims against the primary defendants.

1. On March 21, 1961, the land of this case, the ownership registration of which was made under the name of the Preliminary Defendants on the ground that the ownership transfer was made under the name of RI, the father of the Preliminary Defendants on November 8, 1972. On October 11, 1994, the ownership transfer registration was completed for each of the 12 shares in the name of Preliminary Defendants on the ground that each of the 12 shares was inherited due to a consultation division. On September 27, 2011, with respect to the above 12 shares of Preliminary Defendants E, the ownership transfer registration was completed on the ground that each public land was acquired through consultation on November 11, 2011.

The network J will be the plaintiffs, and the network K is the father of the plaintiffs.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 3 through 8 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) The registration of ownership transfer in the name of the deceased and his heir, who acquired ownership of the land of this case without completing the registration, was negligent in managing the land of this case. Since the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the primary defendant, which was made based on the above invalidation registration, is null and void, the primary defendant is liable to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer based on the restoration of real name as to the land of this case against the plaintiffs, who are the heir of the deceased K. (2) The primary defendant, who violated the procedure for the first preliminary claim for confirmation of the completion of agreement as stipulated in the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes in the course of the consultation acquisition of the land of this case, thereby causing losses to the plaintiffs who lost their right to claim ownership or ownership transfer registration as a result of the violation of the procedure for the first preliminary claim for confirmation of ownership transfer as to the land of this case. The primary defendant is liable to pay compensation to the plaintiffs as a tort.

3..