logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.07.13 2015가합3364
구상금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

(b)be owned;

(3) On July 29, 201, Plaintiff C&C leased and used part of the instant building (hereinafter “Defendant’s warehouse”) from L&C, respectively, on August 31, 2012, and on June 13, 2013, the Defendant leased and used part of the instant building (hereinafter “Defendant’s warehouse”) from L&C.

B. On October 01, 2014, the Plaintiff Samsung Fire and the Plaintiff’s C&C concluded an insurance contract with the following content:

(hereinafter referred to as "the insurance contract of this case") * Insurance types: PACKGE (Wearing insurance): No. 813934018000000: policyholders: * Insured: Contetraflus Korea (State) and * Insurance Purposes or location: Business site of Contetrac in the building of this case * Insurance Period * January 01, 2014 and 01.01. * (hereinafter referred to as "Contec and parts related to this case: 1: KR7, 252, 40-EU, 50-EU, 500-EU, 5036, 306, 360-28: self-security : 06.36.6.36.6.26.26.

C. On November 29, 2014, at around 18:22, a fire occurred in part of the instant building (hereinafter “instant fire”). The instant fire was destroyed by not only the storage of the Defendant but also the Plaintiff’s workplace located immediately adjacent to the Defendant’s warehouse, and its inside machinery, etc., and the Plaintiff’s container was unable to operate all factories and operate until the instant fire was destroyed by the fire.

The Plaintiff Samsung Fire, which caused the fire accident, is from the Plaintiff’s container.

arrow