logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.16 2016고정66
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 6,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired on April 18, 2015, 2015, “2016 High 66” the Defendants received 58 years of age from the victim D (the 58 years of age) with no intention or ability to work at the coffee shop located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, by stating that “We will pay 2.5 million won of the advance payment at Pyeong-si and the 2.5 million won of the advance payment at Pyeong-si and Seoul, and the 2.5 million won of the advance payment at Pyeong-si and the 2.5 million won of the advance payment, each of which was received from the victim on April 20, 2015 (the 2.5 million won of the advance payment in the name of EF bank) and the 2.5 million won of the advance payment in the name of EF bank on April 20, 2015 (the 2.5 million won of the advance payment in the name of EF bank).”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim by deceiving the victim.

On November 26, 2014, the Defendants of "2016, 67, 2016, 2238" and "20,000,000 won for advance payment to the victim at Ida operated by the victim H (the age of 46, n, n) of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G around November 26, 2014, respectively."

However, even if the Defendants received each advance payment from the victim, they did not intend to work as the above multiple employees.

As above, the Defendants, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 4 million from the victim for advance payment, respectively, in the same place.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High Court 66"

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation report (detailed statement of transactions) (Attachment to the detailed statement of transactions) and "2016, 2238";

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the loan certificate;

1. Defendants of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: each of the Defendants is governed by Article 347(1) and (3) of the Criminal Act.

arrow