The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) in light of various sentencing conditions in the instant case’s summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, and the defendant appears to have been driven by a contingency while under the influence of alcohol, etc.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime, which is the same kind of crime, even though he/she was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence on January 17, 201 by driving without a license for drinking or non-driving on five occasions, during the suspended sentence period; the Defendant’s blood alcohol content at the time of the instant crime was higher than 0.237%; the amended Road Traffic Act, as of June 8, 201, provides that the person who violated the prohibition clause on drinking driving twice or more times again shall be punished for driving under the influence of alcohol with the intention to prevent the driving under the influence of the road traffic and to realize awareness of it; and in full view of other various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.