logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2014가단5087444 (1)
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant was granted a loan from mentmena Lenman Co., Ltd. on March 11, 2014, which led to KRW 50 million as of March 11, 201, and interest for delay at KRW 133,042,858.

B. On July 31, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired a loan claim against the Defendant from mentmena Loan Co., Ltd., and notified the Defendant of the fact on December 14 of the same year.

C. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the principal and interest of the above loan to the plaintiff.

2. There is no evidence to prove that the judgment-based loan was lent to the Defendant as alleged by the Plaintiff.

(A) According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the acquisition amount claimed by the Plaintiff is deemed to have been extended to the money that was first lent by the U.S. to the Defendant, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that mentorrogenal loan, Inc., the final transferor creditor of the Plaintiff, re-acquisitions the above claim from the obligee who acquired the claim from the U.S. or U.S. Credit Union.). 3. The Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.

arrow