Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 27, 2014, at around 03:00, the Defendant intruded the victim C’s Dabud 202 residing in Ulsan-gun B by removing and destroying the toilet window, and applied a plan to remove the toilet, and then did not discover it, but failed to do so.
In addition, from June 27, 2014 to June 29, 2014, the Defendant attempted to steal the residence of six victims at night, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, but failed to commit a theft.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. Each statement of C, E, F, G, H, and I;
1. A report on the occurrence of a crime, an investigation report (related to attachment of a report on the scene of a crime), an investigation report (related to attachment after photographing a photograph of the scene of the crime), an investigation report (related to any resident's counter-investigation), an investigation report (related to attachment of CCTV record of a suspect who has escaped around the scene of damage);
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to fingerprint appraisal results;
1. Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;
1. From among concurrent crimes, it is inevitable to sentence the defendant on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that the defendant has been punished once for the same kind of crime, repeated crimes committed by intrusion upon the building in which he lives or the surrounding neighborhood, subject to the crime of intrusion upon the indoor residential space, and the nature and circumstances of such crime and the fact that there is no agreement with the victims, etc. are considered.
However, the above punishment shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession and reflectiveness of the defendant, and the occurrence of all crimes between the defendant and the three days, and the attempted crimes, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.