1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A Co., Ltd. is from August 24, 2017 for KRW 351,403,674 and KRW 130,302,418 among them.

On September 6, 2007, the Credit Guarantee Fund received a claim for reimbursement from the Jeonju District Court 2007Kahap3277 against Defendant A, a principal debtor for the indemnity obligation under the Credit Guarantee Contract, and D and F, a joint surety for the said obligation, and filed a lawsuit on September 6, 2007. “Defendant A, D and F, jointly and severally, shall be 14,328,907 won, and 130,403,928 won among them, shall be 15% per annum from December 9, 2005 to June 16, 2007, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full repayment, and the above judgment becomes final and conclusive, and the Credit Guarantee Fund received an approval of the inheritance from each of the above parties to the lawsuit as the principal debtor, and notified the Plaintiff of the above inheritance among the parties to the lawsuit on June 30, 2017.

According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff who is the transferee of the above judgment bond, and the defendant A Co., Ltd. as the principal debtor.

Defendant C, D, and E are co-sureties’s successors to the network F, a joint and several surety, and the amount calculated according to their respective shares of inheritance from the networkF, within the scope of the property inherited from the networkF, No. 1-B of this case.

paragraphs (1) through (4)

shall be liable to pay each money set forth in the subsection.

Thus, as long as the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit for the extension of extinctive prescription of a claim established by the above final judgment, the instant lawsuit has benefit as a re-instigation for the interruption of extinctive prescription.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is reasonable and all of them.