1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the claim for damages based on a joint tort committed by fraud is withdrawn by this court.

1. In the first instance court, in relation to the claim for damages based on the joint tort of fraud, the Plaintiff primarily received 1,850,000,000 won (i.e., 60,000,000 won obtained by defraudation amount listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 12, 12,000,000 won, 490,360,000 won as stated in [Attachment 13] and the payment of damages for delay, and 1,350,000,000 won as preliminary, (i.e., 250,000,000 won by deceptive money listed in [Attachment 1] No. 3] 50,00,000 won as stated in [Attachment 1] Serial seven above, and only 12,000,000 won and 130,000,000 won and 130,000,000 won and 10,0000,00 damages for delay damages for delay.

(4) The first instance court's judgment dismissing both the remaining main and conjunctive claims. However, in light of the part cited in the first instance court among the plaintiff's claims, it is evident that the first instance court dismissed all of the remainder of the claim among the main and conjunctive claims against the joint tort, and the second instance court's claims based on the non-indicted tort. Accordingly, only the plaintiff is dissatisfied with the claim for damages based on the joint tort of fraud (excluding the part invalidated due to the withdrawal of the lawsuit by this court) and the part against the plaintiff's lost among the claim for consolation money based on the non-indicted tort and the claim for consolation money based on the non-indicted tort. Thus, the judgment of this court is limited to the claim for damages based on the joint tort of fraud and the claim for consolation

2. The premised factual basis.