1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On November 8, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the Defendant to the effect that it is reasonable for the Plaintiff to deliver the same Article, which was taken into Korea, after being stolen from the Pacifics, to Japan. On November 11, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the purport that the Plaintiff would be treated in accordance with the domestic law and international law after the court’s final decision and prosecutor’s disposition, as seized articles related to international crimes.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion was made and brought into the Republic of Korea illegally or domestically, and thus it is reasonable to deliver it to Japan, but the response of this case is unlawful.

3. Determination

A. In order for an administrative agency to become a subject of an administrative disposition against a citizen’s rejection of a petition filed by him/her, the citizen must have a right to demand that the citizen engage in an administrative act in accordance with the petition. If an administrative agency refuses to accept a petition filed by a citizen who is not in accordance with such a right but refuses to do so, it does not affect the applicant’s right or legal interest, and thus, it cannot be deemed an administrative disposition that is subject to an appeal litigation.

(See Supreme Court Decision 84Nu227 delivered on October 23, 1984, etc.). B.

The health care unit is whether there is a right under the law or cooking that allows the plaintiff to request the defendant to deliver the same early marriage to Japan, and the plaintiff is naturally a national of the Republic of Korea who has the right to demand correction of the law enforcement of the administrative agency's unfair enforcement, and it does not present any specific grounds therefor.

In addition, the response of this case is reasonable to deliver it to Japan.