All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes set forth in Articles 1 and 2 as stated in the judgment below and 3 and 4 as stated in the judgment below) is too uneased and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the Defendant by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. We examine both the judgment prosecutor and the defendant's unfair argument of sentencing, and the defendant recognize and reflects all of the crimes of this case, the defendant's agreement at the original trial with I and J among the victims of the attempted crimes of this case among the victims of the crimes of this case, and the defendant's agreement with I and J among the victims of the attempted crimes of this case was reached in the first trial, and the victim was in the first trial with K and the victim was in the first trial, and the victim was in the first trial, and the defendant was in the first trial, and there was no actual pecuniary profit, the defendant did not have the same criminal record, and the defendant did not have the same criminal record, and the crimes of Articles 3 and 4 of the original judgment with the crime of equity should be considered in the case where the

However, the crime without accusation is a serious crime that disturbs the proper judicial function of the state and the exercise of penal authority.

In addition, where the defendant commits a false rape, it is deemed that, considering its nature, any tangible or intangible damage suffered by the person in question is more severe than that of other crimes.

It is reasonable to view it.

In particular, E among the victims of armed conflicts, was detained by the defendant's wrong accusation.

The method of crime and the circumstances before and after the crime are not good.

The Defendant stated as the victim in the rape case against E in a very concrete and detailed manner.

From the day after the sex relationship with E, various activities were conducted to manipulate evidence.

If there is no critical objective evidence of diagnosis related to the physical problem of E and the opinion of the doctor, the case is likely to have been progress as it is with the intent of the defendant, and E.