beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C, the Plaintiff KRW 16,64,600 and the Plaintiff’s amount of KRW 16,64,60.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
A. On December 17, 2014, around 15:31, 2014, C (D) was oil oiling in the oil storage tank located in the F-owned water storage tank greenhouse located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and when the oil meter board attached to the oil storage tank was damaged, the oil meter board was fire that caused explosion by testamentary gift.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
C A caused the instant accident, and on the other hand, the wind that the fire caused by the instant accident was moved to a vinyl house owned by the Plaintiff in the vicinity of the F’s vinyl house, and the Plaintiff, working in the said vinyl house, suffered image, and the Plaintiff was destroyed by fire, such as a earth and sand screening machine located in the Plaintiff’s vinyl house.
C. On March 2, 2015, on March 11, 2015, the deceased C’s first heir, G, H, and K, a sibling, G, and H, G, and H, on February 23, 2015, the deceased C filed a report to waive the inheritance of the deceased C’s property on February 23, 2015 (Seoul Family Court Decision 2015Mo253), and I, and K filed a report to waive the inheritance of the deceased C’s property on March 11, 2015 (Seoul Family Court Decision 2015Mo314), and J filed a report to waive the inheritance of the deceased C’s property on March 10, 2015, and received a report and acceptance of the report on March 23, 2015.
(D) On March 12, 2015, the Defendant filed a report of limited acceptance of inheritance in the inheritance of the deceased C’s property. On May 20, 2015, the Defendant received an adjudication on acceptance of the report on May 20, 2015.
(2) According to the above-mentioned facts, there is no dispute over the Daejeon Family Court [based on recognition], the entry of Gap evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, and Eul evidence 1-6, and the overall purport of the pleadings, according to the above-mentioned facts, the net C neglects its duty of care not to cause explosion by testamentary gift in the oil storage tank.