logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.11.25 2019가단203913
손해배상(의)
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) From April 9, 2015, the Plaintiff (i) sought to leave the C Hospital due to clothes, snow symptoms, and symptoms that occurred from April 9, 2015, and as a result of the CT examination, the blood was observed in beer. At the request of the power source of the C Hospital, the Plaintiff is the D Hospital operated by the Defendant on April 16, 2015 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as an anti-gropic epidemic typology (APS), and discharged the Plaintiff on April 30, 2015, with a view to preventing pulmonary typhosomes that may occur by preventing the pulmonary mal typule from spreading, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed as an anti-gropic typology (APS) through various tests. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital discharged the Plaintiff on the 30th day of 2015.

3) On May 13, 2015, May 19, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital through an emergency room on May 23, 2015, when the Plaintiff received outpatient treatment from the blood department of the Defendant Hospital. As a result of the upper fire-fighting officer’s internal vision test conducted on June 9, 2015, the Plaintiff observed the vizine infection, but the Plaintiff’s vizine infection was improved after he administered the vizine infection. The medical team of the Defendant Hospital was suspected of having caused the Plaintiff’s gymnassis caused by the Plaintiff’s gymnassis, and the gymnassis was administered along with the stynasium, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on June 24, 2015, and the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital during the period of the gymnasium treatment.

At the time of the Plaintiff’s view of damage to acute acceleration, and the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted a kidne test on July 30, 2015, etc., the Defendant Hospital did not observe any special circumstance.

After August 3, 2015, the plaintiff is entitled to make a report.

arrow