logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.15 2015나2004885
공사대금
Text

1. The part against Defendant C in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

2.On the basis of the selective claims added in the trial:

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment on the claim against Defendant B is as follows: “The 4th of November 12, 201” of the first instance court Decision No. 4; “The 62,313,560 won” of the second instance judgment No. 5; “the 62,313,560 won” of the second instance judgment No. 62,313,560 (the 62,313,560 won should be calculated as follows); and “the 62,313,560 won” of the 18th of the 7th instance judgment as “the 18th of November 2012” and “the 62,313,560 won from November 2013” as “the 420th of November 201,” respectively, shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. On February 4, 2010, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on January 27, 2010 with respect to the land listed in Section 1 of the Attached List No. 1.

(2) After Defendant B and Defendant B newly constructed a building listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table on the ground specified in paragraph (1) of the attached Table, Defendant B and Defendant B completed registration of initial ownership on August 24, 2010 with respect to one half of the buildings listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table.

(3) On October 9, 2012, Defendant B completed the registration of creation of a mortgage over the Defendant C, the maximum debt amount, 240,000, and the maximum debt amount, 240,000, over the share (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant real estate”), among the land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 and the building listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2, which is the only property owned by Defendant B, to Defendant C, as to

On the same day, I had completed the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage with respect to one half of the buildings listed in Section 2 of the attached Table I owned by Defendant C.

(4) On January 21, 2013, Defendant B completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on January 21, 2013, with respect to the instant real estate, which is the only property owned by Defendant B, by Suwon District Court No. 2228, which was the receipt of leisure support from Suwon District Court.

I also has the same content as above with regard to one half of the buildings listed in Section 2 of the attached Table I owned by Defendant C on the same day.

arrow