logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고합477
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 140,00 to F (15 years of age) and G (15 years of age) as the price for sexual traffic, and had the above juveniles f (15 years of age) do a similar act to see and see the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 21 (2) and (4) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months nor more than five years;

2. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines: The basic area (10 months to 2 years and 6 months) (no person in special sentencing) (10 months to 10 months) (no person in special sentencing) shall purchase the sex of children and juveniles from the sexual traffic crime subject to the age of 19.

3. Determination of sentence: 10 months of imprisonment, and 2 years of suspended sentence mean the purchase of sex of a juvenile whose perception of sex is not fully established, and the crime of this case is not less than that of the crime, but it is highly likely to be criticized in that the crime of buying sex of a juvenile has a serious adverse effect on the establishment of the proper and sound sexual culture in our society.

However, it seems that the defendant is recognized by the investigative agency to commit the crime, and that there is no record that the defendant has been punished by the same criminal history or suspended execution or more, and the defendant is 28 years old.

arrow