(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.12.18 2015구단17784

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.12.18 2015구단17784

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on December 3, 2013 with the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”) as a foreigner of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on December 11, 2013.

B. On July 16, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On July 18, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 18, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion changed the course of the Plaintiff’s assertion to Cuba, which was fluoral slicka, around the age of 27.

Since then, the plaintiff was threatened with a concern that the plaintiff will continue to live in cuasta from the Sumpha Mamo-mor's third village as a supporting entity of the slive forest administration group.

Cubura rejected the unslock-type group, and at the time, the Plaintiff participated in the demonstration twice to attract B President of the Unslock-type group, which was located in the jurisdiction of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff was trying to participate in the scheduled demonstration on June 30, 2013, and went out of the Republic of Korea without participating in the demonstration, due to the opposition and intimidation of the Samdlim-type group.

Cubas recognized Cubas as a law, unlike the Acopa wave, in which Cubas, the horse of Alphas and Ecubas, are in the form of law and treated as an associates from the species of Islamic teaching beverages by denying the religious authority of Ecubas.

Therefore, in the event that the plaintiff returns to Egypt, other species are the reason of Egypt.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2015.11.27 2015구단14723

-서울행정법원 2016.01.29 2015구단18831

-서울행정법원 2016.01.13 2015구단60054

-인천지방법원 2016.07.14 2015구합1698

-서울행정법원 2016.03.23 2015구단17715