A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 5, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B, the Defendant, in the information and communications company factory in the 4 North-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in which the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the victim B about the female living together before his father returned to the company.

Since there is no trial cost to care the property equivalent to KRW 400,000 on the ground of his father's land, there is a difference in the amount of KRW 2 million.

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, the Defendant was thought to use it as gambling funds. At the time, the Defendant was liable to the lending company, etc. for the debt amounting to KRW 25 million. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to fully repay the debt even if he received money from the injured party due to his father’s death or no other reason exists, even if he was unable to expect inheritance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 2 million from the injured party for the purpose of borrowing money from the injured party, from the time to July 26, 2016, including by deceiving the injured party and receiving KRW 42,90,000,000 from the injured party for a total of 11 times, such as the 1st century, from July 26, 2016.

2. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C, at the information and communications office, the head of the Si/Gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan-si, 4 mountain-si, in an information and communications office, for which the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, “A father shall rapidly conduct surgery and hospitalized treatment.”

First of all, it is necessary to borrow the operating fee, and it is possible to pay back if the insurance fee enters.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, he thought that he would use it as gambling money, and at the time, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to fully repay even if he received money from the victimized party with a debt amounting to 25 million won.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and takes over KRW 1.5 million from the victim as the borrowed money.