Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the driver of B cargo vehicle owned by the registered logistics company, and the defendant limited liability company is the owner of the above cargo vehicle.

1. Defendant A:

(a) around 14:58 on February 3, 2004, loading cargo (c) with a gross weight exceeding 4.2 tons exceeding 4.2 tons at a point 28.4km of Han-gu Road Construction Work at a point 28.4km of Han-gu Road at a point 4:58 on February 3, 2004 and operating the said vehicle, thereby violating the restrictions on vehicle operation by the road management authority;

B. Around 07:36 on February 12, 2004, at a point 18.14 km on the Southern Sea Expressway, 18.14 km branch of the Korea Highway Corporation at the same mining and manufacturing business office of the Korea Highway Corporation, loading freight exceeding 4.2 tons with gross weight exceeding 4.2 tons, and operating the said vehicle, thereby violating the vehicle operation restriction by the road management authority;

C. Around 14:42 on February 16, 2004, at the same place as the foregoing “B” and at the same time as the foregoing “B,” loading cargo with gross weight exceeding 40 tons exceeding 4.7 tons and operating the said vehicle, thereby violating the restrictions on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority;

2. The defendant-based limited liability company's famous logistics violated the above provisions in relation to the defendant's business at the time and place as stated in each of the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to respective restrictions on operation of vehicles (notices to remove vehicles violating restrictions on operation of expressways, traffic control details, and written confirmation of restricted vehicles);

1. Goods distribution of the accused limited liability company under Articles 83 (1) 2 and 54 (1) of the Road Act concerning criminal facts: Article 86 of the Road Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act shall be confined in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);