logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고단1984
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the B Coindo sports car.

On April 18, 2015, the Defendant operated the above car on April 17:10, 2015, and proceeded with the national highway No. 13 of the Geongsung-gun National Highway Law No. 13 on the parallel parallel distance from the parallel parallel distance.

Since there is a cost of separation, there was a duty of care to safely proceed with the driver's duty of care to the person engaged in the driver's duty of motor vehicle according to the car line.

Nevertheless, the defendant got the front part of the victim C(36 years old) driving, which was driven in the opposite opposite lane due to the negligence of the defendant's intrusion into the opposite lane, as the front part of the victim C(36 years old) driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, including the right-hand salone abandonment, in which treatment for about seven weeks is required, on the part of the victim E (the 34 years old), who took advantage of the above C’s car for about eight weeks, the injury of the left-hand salone abandonment salone in need of treatment, etc., on the part of the victim F (the 4 years old), on the part of the victim F (the 3 years old), on the part of the victim G (the 33 years old), on the part of the victim H (the 41 years old), on the part of the victim H (the 41 year old), on the part of the victim E (the 1st, the 39 years old) who took advantage of the Defendant’s car for about three weeks of treatment, and on the part of the victim I and the 39 years old-old salone for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each statement of E, G, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports on actual conditions, field photographs, and medical certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is driving ahead of the suspended sentence.

2. The traffic accident.

arrow