logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.08.27 2014고단90
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for 10 months, for Defendant B and E, for Defendant C, for one year and four months, and for Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 90]

1. Defendant C, who operates Defendant A, B, and C, has different real estate for residence from the real estate for apartment in which a large market price has been formed according to the location, horizontal number, and ordinary construction cost. In the case of a commercial building, the commercial building can be sold at a price significantly discounted in the case of an unsold commercial building which has not been activated for a long time due to the significant impact on the market price. In addition, in the case where the financial institution purchases commercial buildings as a security and applies for a loan to a financial institution for the purchase of commercial buildings as a result of the large amount of price depending on the appraisal price, the financial institution conducted a loan within the limit of 60% after the appraisal price depends on the actual sale price in calculating the appraisal price. In addition, Defendant C, who purchased commercial buildings A123 billion won (hereinafter “the commercial building of this case”), which had been unsold for several years on November 8, 201, paid the remainder of the sales price to KRW 1.66 billion with the actual purchase price of KRW 1,600,000.

Defendant

Since then, C introduced to Defendant A, one of his employees, a person to purchase KRW 123,500,000,000,000,000,000,000 under the real estate sales contract, and subsequently, Defendant A said, “The actual purchase fund will not be required because it is possible to obtain a loan of KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.”

Accordingly, Defendant A recommended Defendant B, who had been a member of the investment consultation, to purchase KRW 123,50,000,000 for the commercial building of this case, but Defendant B was aware that there was a lot of public room in the commercial building, but it is very urgent to invest in the commercial building that has not been activated, and there is no financial situation.

arrow