logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.12.12 2018고정235
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From January 2, 2018 to January 12, 2018, the Defendant unfairly demanded the replacement of the victim C’s apartment site in the north-Gu B apartment site in the port of port from January 2, 2018 to January 12, 2018, for the E director of the company conducting apartment construction construction by taking advantage of the status of the victim C’s representative.

Although there is no fact to have determined that “1. F. F. unfair practices utilizing the status of the representative - the status of the representative .. using the status of the representative .. the demand to cooperate with the representative . to replace the free window damaged by his mistake (F.) and the E director’s replacement is known to have been made. This constitutes grounds for dismissal under Article 20 of the Management Rules and even if it is possible to change the free of charge, C representative refused absolute refusal as an executive officer of the occupant representative meeting.

It is determined that the removal of the banner should be made. (Along with the absence of the victim's opposition to the posting or removal of the banner for one's own private interest, the victim G posted the banner for a long period of time (6 months) by posting the banner by using the name of "Won 1,200,000 won (Won 1,200,000)", and without the victim's opposition to the removal of the banner for one's own private interest, the victim posted it on the bulletin board, including the place where "3. Instigation by posting the banner for a long time, utilization as a tool for private interest - the posting of the banner for one's own private interest, but the posting of the banner for a long period of time (6 months) is limited to the individual's Domination, which is the whole of the apartment and without the consent of the whole apartment."

Accordingly, the defendant, by pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol attached to the three-time suspect interrogation protocol against the accused (the third suspect interrogation protocol).

arrow