Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 04:50 on July 26, 2016, entered the “D convenience store” located in Osan-si C, and without any special reason, died of the report to E, who is an employee of the above convenience store.

“The E made the 112 report.”

The Defendant, upon receiving the report of E 112, notified the Defendant that he would be punished for interference with the performance of official duties in the event of assaulting the police officer by G, on one occasion on the left hand hand, while making an inquiry to the Defendant about the details of 112 report by H, who was sent to the front of the “D convenience store”, without any reason, at the police officer’s time, at the police officer’s seat belonging to the G G, and on one occasion, at the same time, he would interfere with the performance of official duties in the case of assaulting the police officer.

"I am on the left side of G one time with a bad hand belbel with the drinking."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G and H;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure in the Order of Provisional Payment is deemed to have drinking at the time of the crime, but in light of the situation at the time of the crime, the details of the crime, the Defendant’s speech before and after the crime, the Defendant’s attitude to make a statement to an investigative agency, etc., the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make a decision under the influence of alcohol at the time of crime

It does not appear.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant is drunk without any particular reason.